A satellite’s orbit defines far more than where it travels in space. Orbit selection determines how often a satellite can communicate with Earth, how long each communication window lasts, how much ground infrastructure is required, and how complex mission operations become. For ground station planners and operators, understanding orbit types is essential to designing reliable and efficient systems.
The most commonly discussed orbit types are Low Earth Orbit (LEO), Medium Earth Orbit (MEO), Geostationary Orbit (GEO), and Highly Elliptical Orbit (HEO). Each orbit presents unique tradeoffs that directly affect ground station location, antenna behavior, scheduling complexity, and operational cost. This article explains each orbit from a ground station and mission planning perspective.
Table of contents
- Why Orbit Selection Matters
- Low Earth Orbit (LEO)
- Medium Earth Orbit (MEO)
- Geostationary Orbit (GEO)
- Highly Elliptical Orbit (HEO)
- Orbit Types and Ground Station Design
- Impacts on Passes and Scheduling
- Choosing Orbits from a Ground Perspective
- Orbit Types FAQ
- Glossary
Why Orbit Selection Matters
Orbit selection is one of the earliest and most influential decisions in mission design. It determines how satellites move relative to Earth, which in turn defines when and where they can communicate with ground stations. Ground infrastructure must be designed around these access patterns, not the other way around.
A mismatch between orbit type and ground station strategy can result in limited coverage, high latency, excessive operational complexity, or unnecessary cost. Conversely, a well-matched orbit and ground segment enable efficient communication, predictable scheduling, and scalable operations. Mission planning therefore treats orbit selection and ground station design as tightly coupled decisions.
Low Earth Orbit (LEO)
Low Earth Orbit typically ranges from about 160 to 2,000 kilometers above Earth. Satellites in LEO move rapidly relative to the ground, completing an orbit in roughly 90 to 120 minutes. From a ground station perspective, this results in short but frequent communication windows known as passes.
Because each pass may last only a few minutes, LEO missions require precise antenna tracking and efficient operations. Ground stations must acquire the signal quickly, execute planned activities, and release the satellite before it sets below the horizon. Missed seconds during a pass directly reduce mission capability.
LEO missions benefit greatly from networks of ground stations distributed around the globe. A single station provides limited coverage, while a network dramatically increases contact opportunities and reduces data delivery latency. As a result, LEO ground segments tend to be operationally complex but highly scalable.
Medium Earth Orbit (MEO)
Medium Earth Orbit lies between LEO and GEO, typically from about 2,000 to 35,786 kilometers above Earth. Satellites in MEO move more slowly relative to the ground, resulting in longer passes but fewer total contacts per day compared to LEO.
From a ground station perspective, MEO offers a balance between coverage and complexity. Passes last longer, reducing time pressure on operators, while still requiring active tracking. Antenna movement is slower and less demanding than in LEO, which simplifies mechanical and control requirements.
MEO constellations often use a moderate number of ground stations to achieve global coverage. The reduced number of handovers compared to LEO simplifies scheduling and coordination, making MEO attractive for navigation and timing missions where predictable access is critical.
Geostationary Orbit (GEO)
Geostationary Orbit places satellites at approximately 35,786 kilometers above the equator, where they orbit at the same rate Earth rotates. From the ground, a GEO satellite appears fixed in the sky, maintaining constant visibility from a specific region.
For ground stations, GEO offers the simplest operational model. Antennas can remain pointed at a fixed location, eliminating the need for continuous tracking. Communication can occur continuously rather than in discrete passes, enabling stable, high-throughput links.
However, GEO ground stations must contend with longer signal travel times, resulting in higher latency. Coverage is also limited by latitude, with poor visibility at extreme polar regions. These factors shape how GEO missions design both ground infrastructure and services.
Highly Elliptical Orbit (HEO)
Highly Elliptical Orbits are characterized by elongated paths that bring satellites very close to Earth at perigee and far away at apogee. These orbits are often designed so that satellites spend extended time over specific regions, particularly high-latitude areas poorly served by GEO.
From a ground station perspective, HEO introduces variable geometry and timing. Communication windows may be long when the satellite is near apogee and short or unusable near perigee. Ground systems must adapt to rapidly changing range and signal conditions.
HEO missions often require specialized planning and fewer but strategically placed ground stations. The operational complexity is higher than GEO but can provide unique coverage advantages for certain regions and applications.
Orbit Types and Ground Station Design
Each orbit type drives different ground station design requirements. LEO systems prioritize fast tracking, automation, and network coordination. GEO systems emphasize stability, high availability, and continuous operation.
Antenna size, RF performance, redundancy, and site selection all depend on orbit choice. Designing ground stations without considering orbit dynamics often leads to overbuilt or underperforming systems. Successful missions treat orbit and ground design as a single integrated problem.
Impacts on Passes and Scheduling
Orbit type directly determines how passes occur and how they must be scheduled. LEO missions require precise scheduling and tight execution windows. MEO missions allow more flexibility but still rely on accurate predictions.
GEO missions largely eliminate pass scheduling in favor of continuous access, simplifying operations but increasing reliance on system availability. HEO missions require careful planning to take advantage of long dwell times while managing periods of poor visibility.
Choosing Orbits from a Ground Perspective
Orbit selection should always consider ground station implications alongside spacecraft and payload requirements. An orbit that looks ideal from space may impose unsustainable demands on ground infrastructure.
By evaluating orbit types through coverage, latency, complexity, and cost, mission planners can select strategies that align space and ground segments. This alignment is critical for long-term operational success.
Orbit Types FAQ
Does a lower orbit always mean better performance?
No. Lower orbits reduce latency but increase operational complexity and
ground infrastructure requirements.
Why do LEO missions use so many ground stations?
Because short passes and fast satellite motion require frequent contact
opportunities to maintain data flow and control.
Can one ground station support multiple orbit types?
Yes, but antenna systems, scheduling, and RF equipment must be designed
to accommodate different dynamics and requirements.
Glossary
LEO: Low Earth Orbit with fast-moving satellites and short passes.
MEO: Medium Earth Orbit with moderate altitude and pass duration.
GEO: Geostationary Orbit where satellites appear fixed over Earth.
HEO: Highly Elliptical Orbit providing long dwell times over specific regions.
Pass: Time window when a satellite is visible to a ground station.
Apogee: Point in an orbit farthest from Earth.
Perigee: Point in an orbit closest to Earth.
More
