In ground stations and satellite terminals, antenna performance is usually explained with three linked ideas: gain (how strongly the antenna concentrates energy), beamwidth (how wide the main beam is), and pointing error (how far off-target you can be before performance drops). These parameters drive link margin, tracking requirements, and even practical choices like mount class, radome design, and calibration routines. This article gives clear rules of thumb you can use when estimating performance and operational risk.
Table of contents
- Why Gain, Beamwidth, and Pointing Are Connected
- Antenna Gain in Practical Terms
- Beamwidth: What It Means and Why It Matters
- The Core Rule of Thumb: Narrower Beam, Higher Risk
- Pointing Error: How It Shows Up in Real Operations
- Rules of Thumb You Can Use Right Away
- How to Budget Pointing Error in a Link Budget
- Tracking LEO vs GEO: Why Orbit Changes the Problem
- Practical Ways to Reduce Pointing Loss
- Antenna Gain FAQ
- Glossary
Why Gain, Beamwidth, and Pointing Are Connected
A dish (or any directional antenna) works by concentrating RF energy into a main beam. The more tightly it concentrates that energy, the higher the gain—and the narrower the beamwidth. A narrower beam improves link performance but reduces tolerance to misalignment. That’s why pointing and tracking become more demanding as frequency increases or as antenna size grows.
Antenna Gain in Practical Terms
Gain is a measure of how effectively an antenna focuses energy compared to an ideal isotropic radiator. In practical link engineering, higher gain improves both:
Receive performance: the antenna “hears” the satellite better.
Transmit performance: the antenna concentrates uplink power, increasing EIRP in the desired direction.
For parabolic dishes, gain increases with aperture area and with frequency. That’s why the same physical dish provides more gain at Ka-band than at S-band—while also producing a much narrower beam.
Beamwidth: What It Means and Why It Matters
Beamwidth is the angular width of the main lobe. In operations, the most common reference is the 3 dB beamwidth, meaning the angle off boresight where received power drops by about half (3 dB).
Beamwidth matters because it defines how “forgiving” your antenna is. If your beam is wide, you can be a little sloppy and still stay near peak gain. If your beam is narrow, small tracking or alignment errors quickly translate into noticeable link loss.
The Core Rule of Thumb: Narrower Beam, Higher Risk
The simplest mental model is:
Higher gain → narrower beamwidth → lower tolerance to pointing error.
That “risk” shows up as lost margin, fluctuating C/N, reduced throughput, or intermittent drops—especially at low elevation angles or during fast LEO passes.
Pointing Error: How It Shows Up in Real Operations
Pointing error is the difference between where the antenna is aimed and where it should be aimed. It comes from a mix of:
Mechanical factors: mount backlash, encoder resolution, flex under wind load, foundation movement, thermal expansion.
Modeling factors: imperfect pointing model, refraction assumptions, polarization alignment errors.
Control factors: tuning, latency, servo limits, and tracking speed (especially for LEO).
Environment: wind gusts, ice buildup, radome effects, and local obstructions.
In practice, pointing error often looks like a slow bias (systematic mispoint) plus jitter (random variation).
Rules of Thumb You Can Use Right Away
These rules are approximations, but they’re useful early in design and troubleshooting:
Rule 1: Beamwidth shrinks as frequency rises.
If you keep the same dish size and move from S-band to Ku/Ka, expect a much narrower beam and a tighter pointing requirement.
Rule 2: Stay within a small fraction of the 3 dB beamwidth.
A common operational goal is to keep combined pointing error comfortably below the 3 dB beamwidth so you don’t live on the steep part of the gain curve.
If your error approaches the 3 dB beamwidth, you should expect several dB of loss at times.
Rule 3: Wind turns into pointing loss faster at high gain.
The same wind-induced deflection that barely matters at UHF can be a service-affecting impairment at Ku/Ka with a narrow beam.
Rule 4: LEO tracking demands more than GEO “set-and-hold.”
Even modest latency and acceleration limits can create effective pointing error in fast LEO passes, especially near zenith where rates change quickly.
Rule 5: Bias is often worse than jitter.
A constant misalignment keeps you permanently off-peak. Jitter may average out, but bias quietly removes margin from every link.
How to Budget Pointing Error in a Link Budget
In a link budget, pointing error is typically represented as a pointing loss term (in dB). It is treated like any other degradation: atmospheric loss, polarization mismatch, radome loss, feed loss, or implementation loss.
The practical approach is:
1) Define your beamwidth and required margin.
2) Estimate worst-case pointing error (bias + jitter + wind + modeling).
3) Convert that error into a conservative pointing loss allowance.
4) Validate during commissioning with real measurements of C/N vs offset and tracking logs.
If you’re consistently underperforming by a couple of dB, pointing loss is one of the first places to look—especially if the RF chain tests fine.
Tracking LEO vs GEO: Why Orbit Changes the Problem
GEO: The satellite appears nearly fixed, so the system mostly fights wind, mechanical drift, and slow model bias. Pointing is comparatively stable,
and long-term calibration matters.
LEO: The antenna must track continuously with changing rates and accelerations. Errors come from control loop limitations, timing, TLE/model quality,
and dynamic effects—on top of the usual mechanical issues.
If your station serves both, it’s common to have different pointing models and different acceptance thresholds per orbit class.
Practical Ways to Reduce Pointing Loss
The best fixes are usually operational and mechanical before they are “RF tweaks”:
Calibrate the pointing model using known beacons or strong reference satellites.
Improve mount health: backlash adjustment, encoder checks, lubrication, foundation integrity.
Harden against wind: stiffer structure, wind screen/radome considerations, tuned servo control.
Verify timing and ephemeris: correct time source, low-latency control path, accurate orbital elements.
Check polarization alignment: polarization errors can masquerade as “pointing” issues via reduced received power.
Antenna Gain FAQ
Does a bigger dish always mean a better link?
Often, but not automatically. Bigger dishes increase gain and margin, but they narrow beamwidth and raise sensitivity to wind and pointing error. If the mount, controls, and site aren’t good enough, a larger dish can create new operational problems.
Why does Ka-band feel “touchier” than Ku?
Ka-band typically has narrower beams for the same antenna size and is more sensitive to atmospheric effects. That combination makes small pointing errors and weather losses show up more clearly in performance metrics.
How can I tell if my problem is pointing or RF chain noise?
Pointing issues often correlate with wind, elevation angle, or tracking dynamics and show up as oscillation or bias in pointing logs. RF chain issues tend to be more constant and may appear as a uniform sensitivity loss across passes. Measuring signal vs deliberate offset can separate the two.
Glossary
Gain: How strongly an antenna concentrates RF energy in a direction, relative to an isotropic radiator.
Beamwidth (3 dB): Angular width where the antenna response drops by about 3 dB from peak.
Boresight: The antenna’s main pointing direction (center of the main beam).
Pointing error: Difference between desired pointing angle and actual pointing angle.
Pointing loss: Link degradation (in dB) caused by pointing error moving the signal off the peak of the antenna pattern.
EIRP: Effective Isotropic Radiated Power—apparent transmit power in the direction of maximum antenna gain.
Tracking: Continuously steering an antenna to follow a moving satellite across the sky.
Jitter: Rapid, small pointing variations caused by wind, control noise, or mechanical vibration.
More
